Empowerment part II
Posted in Latest News by jeff at 5:23 pm
I’ve been thinking a lot about Scott’s treatise “Empowerment.
Entitlement. Partnership” – and want to throw down some of my thoughts:
There are many great bands who’ve come from the indie ranks, touched every wrung on the ladder (twice, three times, probably) and are the better for it. The business that Scott and Flaming Lips have built over the past 20 years is a shining example of this. People should study the Flaming Lips’ story – find out how they built their business before, during and after the band’s success at radio with “She Don’t Use Jelly.” How did that set them up for the kind of artistic freedom at Reprise that allowed them to – gasp – take more chances creatively, and garner more success at radio, retail, touring, etc.?
In my world, I constantly talk to the artists and producers I work with about the idea that we are building a business - the same as the guy who has the coffee shop on the corner, or the entrepreneurs who started YouTube. Hell, just getting everyone into the head space that what you are doing is a BUSINESS, and that a band is an entrepreneurial enterprise, is a HUGE step. And that can empower everyone on the team. I recommend books to bands (more on that later)….
We have to see what we do as a partnership with our bands, managers, publicists, distributors, agencies - everyone pitching in to work toward the common goal - or we will falter. It’s imperative that artists see their team as an actual team, and that they, too, find a way to pitch in, communicate with everyone and keep everyone on point. The information superhighway has made this a lot easier for bands - “pitching in” can mean writing and sending an email blast to announce a tour, or just getting back to the agent about the support act for the tour, or approving artwork in an hour instead of a week.
A lot of people who have immense musical talent can’t shake the fantasy that “someone else” will handle all the heavy lifting. It’s easy to understand this. You never read a rock bio in which the hero (Robert Plant, Jim Morrison, HR from Bad Brains) lined up the meet and greet backstage, or hustled extra money out of the label for special foil print packaging. Indeed, we have been taught - hypnotized into thinking - that the people who write all deep lyrics, wicked guitar solos and insane drum turnarounds should be able to F off all day, turn up drunk to the show and “just play, man.”
I have a feeling that in 20 years when the rock bios of today’s giant bands (Arcade Fire, The Killers, Fall Out Boy, Panic At The Disco) come out, there will be plenty of talk about hands-on band activity. From what I know of these bands, they are all heavily involved in the daily operation of their enterprise. The personal touch is recognized by their fans and appreciated by their partners at the label, booking agency, etc.



I have to say I am in full agreement with most of the views expressed so far.
Undoubtedly major changes in thinking is needed in the music industry and has been needed for a very long time.Only now we have major labels going into panic mode because they have not got to grips witht the internet revolution. Panic in itself is no use whatsoever nor is resistance to change! In order to have a vibrant business you must be able to think in an innovative way.
This applies equally to musicians themselves as it does to other partners in the business.
Some have been able to make the most of new opportunities and have grabbed the chance to promoter themselves. A considerable number though are stuck in the traditional mindset of how things have been done and find it very hard to grasp what to do otherwise? Artists by nature are not necessarily the best at being business minded and thats why they need to rely on others to work with them who can provide the required skills into the partnership.
A particular concern of mine is that with all the uncertainty going on at the moment a lot of bands are struggling to make an impact because they dont have the correct guidance.
Also i have a suspicion that labels themselves are holding back on working with new talent because they dont know what is going to happen next or indeed if they will survive.
To me, this means a negative knock on effect!
My experience of attempting to help one such band (a Scots Indie band caled afterchristmas) has been one of seeing a fair level of initial interest being shown by a&r but as yet not even the slightest sign of something concrete happening which would allow them to develop their dream.
This seems to be pretty much the case with a few decent bands I have come in contact with.
It leads me to conclude that it is therefore harder for some to make that initial breakthrough than it has been in the past. If i am correct in that assumption then we may lose out ultimately on new talent emerging.
Beyond a shadow of a doubt more idiots are required to lead the way as change is required and it is a change that needs to be driven from genuine love of music and not from fast bucks.
Comment by Rod — February 26, 2007 @ 8:09 pm